{"id":6511,"date":"2015-07-25T03:12:43","date_gmt":"2015-07-25T03:12:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.froginawell.net\/frog\/?p=6511"},"modified":"2015-07-25T03:12:43","modified_gmt":"2015-07-25T03:12:43","slug":"reading-note-oleg-benesch-inventing-the-way-of-the-samurai-nationalism-internationalism-and-bushido-in-modern-japan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/2015\/07\/reading-note-oleg-benesch-inventing-the-way-of-the-samurai-nationalism-internationalism-and-bushido-in-modern-japan\/","title":{"rendered":"Reading Note: Oleg Benesch, &#8220;Inventing the way of the Samurai: Nationalism, Internationalism, and Bushido in Modern Japan&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before I praise Benesch&#8217;s book, a complaint: Oxford UP pricing is absurd. Now that&#8217;s not unusual for academic hardbacks, monographs that go to libraries and specialists. But 1) Benesch&#8217;s book should be a standard teaching text in modern Japanese history and culture, 2) there&#8217;s no reason for the ebook version to cost US$78. There are no diagrams, no pictures with expensive rights issues, no reason why this work shouldn&#8217;t be read widely, except that I can&#8217;t possibly justify assigning it. Maybe next time I teach my <a href=\"http:\/\/dresnerjapan.edublogs.org\/syllabi\/syllabus-samurai-2011-fall\/\">Samurai<\/a> class, it&#8217;ll be available as a paperback, or perhaps they&#8217;ll come to their senses about digital access, but this time around I&#8217;ll just have to tell students what they&#8217;ve missed. <\/p>\n<p>Overall, it&#8217;s a great book, a very useful and substantial piece of scholarship. The core is a careful explication of something we&#8217;ve known for a long time but needed someone to document properly: bushid&#333; is a modern phenomenon, and has been a very flexible, if not benign, ideological construct within modern Japanese national discourses. To put it simply, a myth which means whatever it needs to mean. As Benesch says in the conclusion:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The roots of modern <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>are found not in the historical samurai class, although <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>theorists picked up pre-Meiji writings in the twentieth century to legitimate their ideas. Instead, the first discussions of <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>in the late nineteenth century were a nativist response that sought to provide an indigenous alternative to Western ideals while distancing Japan from China. &#8230; From the beginning of the modern discourse on <em>bushid&#333;<\/em>, the concept served as a vessel for myriad philosophies, giving it the great resilience seen in its continued prominence. &#8230; most post-war researchers reverted to a focus on <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>as a &#8216;way of the samurai&#8217; as it had been originally formulated in Meiji, rather than the more expansive &#8216;way of the warrior&#8217; that dominated early Showa discourse. &#8230; On the one hand, appeals to historical ties popularly legitimize <em>bushid&#333;<\/em>, while on the other hand, the lack of historical evidence regarding any commonly accepted definition of <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>before Meiji gives its modern interpreters considerable flexibility and allows the concept to be adapted for various purposes. &#8230; As long as territorial disputes and controversies over interpretations of history continue, the notion that Japan is guided by a martial ethic will cause problems. This is exacerbated by recent trends to reissue imperial <em>bushid&#333; <\/em>texts from early Showa, both in print and online, often without any contextualization. &#8230; The diversity and flexibility of the concept prevented the imperial state from exclusively defining <em>bushid&#333;<\/em>, but by focusing on a timeless &#8216;way of the warrior&#8217; rather than the more limiting historical samurai, this invented tradition can be mobilized for almost any contingency.&#8221; (245-247)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Benesch&#8217;s decision to italicize &#8220;<em>bushid&#333;<\/em>&#8221; throughout is interesting. Obviously, the old typesetting reasons for dropping italics after first use are no longer relevant, but there&#8217;s something about the way the italics emphasize the persistence of foreignness that I think was a deliberate decision. That highlights one thing I think remains to be done, by Benesch or someone else: a more detailed look at the way in which <em>bushid&#333;<\/em> becomes part of non-Japanese discourses, and not just about Japan. In the US, there&#8217;s an increasingly urgent discussion about policing in which the &#8216;guardian&#8217; and &#8216;warrior&#8217; models are contrasted sharply, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s entirely coincidental that the &#8216;warrior&#8217; model rises to dominance at the same time that <em>bushid&#333;<\/em>-heavy martial arts cultures become the lingua franca of personal combat training. <\/p>\n<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s a great book, if you can afford it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before I praise Benesch&#8217;s book, a complaint: Oxford UP pricing is absurd. Now that&#8217;s not unusual for academic hardbacks, monographs that go to libraries and specialists. But 1) Benesch&#8217;s book should be a standard teaching text in modern Japanese history and culture, 2) there&#8217;s no reason for the ebook version to cost US$78. There are&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[111,185,187,230,61,191,201,205,206],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-martial-arts","category-memory","category-military","category-nationalism","category-pedagogy","category-201","category-205","category-206"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9yoH3-1H1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6511"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6515,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511\/revisions\/6515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/froginawell.net\/frog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}