Treaties, Laws and Speeches

Texts from the Tokyo Gazette, Contemporary Japan and year books of the Japanese empire
Document

Oral Representation Made by the Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr. Renzo Sawada, to the British and American Ambassadors at Tokyo Regarding the Question of the Settlement in Shanghai, May 3, 1939

Type
Document
Date
3 May 1939
Speaker / issued by
Renzo Sawada, Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs
Parties
Japan · Great Britain · United States
Printed in
Tokyo Gazette, June, 1939, pp. 42-43
Section
Oral Representation—Regarding the Question of the Settlement in Shanghai—

(a) The administrative structure and systems of the Settlement are defective in many respects rendering them wholly unsuitable to the present situation, including the Land Regulations, on which the administration of the Settlement is based. The provisions of the Land Regulations now in force, save on a few minor points, remain exactly the same as those of the Land Regulations of 1866. In other words, the Settlement is still governed by a set of basic regulations enacted seventy-three years ago when the Settlement was less then [sic] one-third of its present area, when foreigners residing there numbered no more than 2,200 and when there were only about 90,000 Chinese residents. Unquestionably the existing administrative structure and systems of the Settlement are in many respects inadequate to meet the new situation which has developed in the ensuing 70 odd years.

(b) To enable the Settlement to adapt itself to the actual conditions now obtaining and to discharge properly its functions, not a few improvements and innovations should be introduced into its administrative machinery and its operation. Several years ago the question of the reform of the Municipal Council was eagerly discussed in the Press of Shanghai. It was then pointed out that the system of election for the Municipal Council was undemocratic; that the British monopolized important offices in the Municipal Council, held an overwhelming majority in its other offices and tended to be oligarchical in administering its affairs. It was further asserted that administrative expenses were excessive, and therefore, a considerable retrenchment of expenditure was required in regard to the Volunteer Corps, the Orchestra and education, and in other respects; and that the budgetary expenditure of the Municipal Council, especially that relating to education, was not fairly distributed among the different national communities. All these assertions were generally justified.

(c) To make smooth the working of the administrative machinery of the Settlement, it is imperative that the structure of the Municipal Council should be remodelled with a view to meeting the requirements of the present day. It is also necessary that the nationals of all the countries interested should have a fair and just voice in the affairs of the Municipal Council. The voice of the Japanese community, despite the enormous Japanese interests there, is not given a due and fair expression in the administration of the Settlement. This is evident from the small number of the Japanese Councillors, from the position of Japanese officers in the Municipal Police Department, or from how Japanese officials stand in the other departments of general administration. A reasonable adjustment of the present conditions, which are so unfair and unsatisfactory, is

therefore, imperatively necessary.

(d) In considering the status and administration of the Settlement it should be borne in mind that a radical change has come over the general situation in China since the outbreak of the China Affair. Especially in Shanghai and its neighbourhood, the situation has completely changed. New régimes, distinct and separate from the Chiang Kai-shek régime, have come into existence and are functioning—the Special City Government in Shanghai and the Weihsin (new) Government in Central China. It is most desirable, therefore, that the Settlement authorities should closely cooperate with the Special City Government for the maintenance of peace and order, and for the safeguarding of general public welfare, in Shanghai and its vicinity. For that purpose some measures must be taken immediately. For instance, practical consideration should be given to the position of the Chinese Court of Justice existing within the Settlement; and the question of restitution of the old City Government's Land Registers held in custody by the Municipal Council must be speedily settled.

(e) The Japanese Government cannot pass unnoticed the rampancy of anti-Japanese elements or those elements hostile to the new régimes in China, who are taking advantage of the special status of the Settlement in carry [sic] on their lawless activities. It is incumbent upon the Settlement authorities and upon all the interested countries to accord serious consideration to the necessity of effecting a thorough control of the terrorism, anti-Japanese propaganda and all other malignant acts of these elements, and to take the requisite steps accordingly.

Transcription note

Printed page number not shown on first page; 42 per the index. Source reads "less then one-third" in para (a).

← PreviousAddress of the American Ambassador, Mr. Joseph Clark Grew, at the Funeral of Hiroshi Saito at the Honganji, Tokyo, April 18, 1939Next →Ordinances Recently Promulgated