Windschuttle on Mao

I am feeling very remiss for not having posted since Konrad gave me a log-in. I am a PhD student at Cambridge looking at China and Southeast Asia. My dissertation is (currently – it has undergone some metamorphoses) on social change as reflected in women’s writing 1880-1920.

I came across something a couple of days ago that I thought merited a post. This article from the New Criterion is of interest, discussing broadly the history of Western writers who were sympathetic to Mao, and how they influenced opinion in the West, and how the new Chang/Halliday book will change views on China. (a log-in may be required at the New Criterion site, don’t worry it is free)
I don’t know whether Winschuttle is overstating it, but then he is a controversialist. (and anyone in history should read his The Killing of History for a strong analysis on the culture wars within the discipline).


  1. Most of what’s “new” in Chang/Halliday isn’t really new (and the rest of it is highly dubious). The Age review is much clearer than Windschuttle, who’s got no background in Chinese history or historiography, and appears to take Chang at face value.

  2. At some point we’re going to have to have a serious discussion of this book (my review copy is on the way, reportedly), but until then, we’ll just have to settle for keeping lists of reviews: Arthur Waldron in Commentary: PDF.

    It’s structurally a lot like Kristof’s NYT review: pretty much a straight summary, with quibbles (none of which address substance and none of which are even hinted at in the uncritical summary) at the end.

    (and here’s a page with links to a lot of published reviews)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.